Brookings Senior Fellows Richard Bush and Ryan Hass, co-authors with Bonnie Glaser of a brand new Brookings Press e-book on U.S.-Taiwan relations within the context of China’s problem, argue that tensions between the PRC and Taiwan can solely be resolved with the assent of Taiwan’s individuals. Taiwan’s presidential election lead to 2024 will even have an effect on how a lot strain Beijing applies to cross-Taiwan Strait relations, they clarify.
TRANSCRIPT
[music]
DOLLAR: Hello, I’m David Greenback, host of the Brookings commerce podcast Greenback and Sense. At present, we’re going to speak about Taiwan. Particularly, a brand new e-book from Brookings Press referred to as U.S. Taiwan Relations: Will China’s Problem Result in a Disaster? This e-book was written by Bonnie Glaser, who’s the pinnacle of the German Marshall Fund’s China program, and two Brookings senior fellows who’ve deep expertise in Taiwan, Richard Bush and Ryan Haas. So, I’m lucky to have Richard and Ryan with me at this time. So, Richard, welcome to the present.
BUSH: Thanks. It’s good to be right here.
DOLLAR: And Ryan, welcome to you as nicely.
HASS: Thanks, David.
DOLLAR: So, Richard, let’s begin with you. I believe there’s usually quite a lot of confusion concerning the official U.S. place on Taiwan, which in my opinion hasn’t actually modified a lot between Republican and Democratic administrations going again fairly a number of a long time. So may you succinctly inform us, what’s the U.S. official place on Taiwan? And in addition, do our key allies in Europe and Japan have the identical view, or is there some daylight amongst us?
BUSH: Properly, okay, we’d like just a little little bit of historical past right here. After the Chinese language civil warfare led to 1949, the world was left with two Chinese language governments. The winner was the Folks’s Republic of China, which controls the mainland of China. And the loser was the Republic of China, which controls Taiwan. And these two governments contended relentlessly for worldwide recognition, and every insisted that different nations like america had to decide on both one or the opposite—we couldn’t have two Chinas. So, in 1978 and 1979, america determined for strategic causes that it needed to finish its previous relationship with the Republic of China and shift to the Folks’s Republic of China.
So, we acknowledged the Folks’s Republic of China authorities as the federal government of China. We ended diplomatic relations with the Republic of China authorities on Taiwan. We ended the protection treaty with the ROC. We pledged that we might have unofficial relations with Taiwan, and that could be a key facet of the present tensions.
However we solely acknowledged the Chinese language view that the territory of Taiwan was a part of China’s sovereign territory. These are the fundamentals of our Taiwan coverage. They return to 1979.
However there’s yet another vital one, and that’s what’s our view on how this dispute between the PRC and the ROC ought to be resolved. To start with, it’s the U.S. place that this ought to be resolved by the 2 events themselves. Second, it ought to be resolved peacefully. And third, that it ought to be resolved with the assent of the individuals of Taiwan. And that’s a recognition of the truth that Taiwan has a democratic system.
DOLLAR: And what about our allies, our key allies in Europe and Asia, like Japan? Would you say their place is mainly the identical?
BUSH: Sure, their place is mainly the identical. They acknowledge the PRC as the federal government of China, however they’re ambiguous on the authorized standing of Taiwan.
DOLLAR: So, Ryan, let’s flip to you. You had been the China director on the Nationwide Safety Council on the finish of the Obama administration. And since then, we’ve had Trump administration and Biden administration. Do you see continuity within the insurance policies of those two current administrations? And possibly a extra vital query is does Beijing see continuity within the insurance policies of those two administrations, or does Beijing have motive to suppose that we’ve modified our views?
HASS: Properly, David, I believe the trustworthy fact is that each Washington and Beijing have shifted their strategy to Taiwan in recent times. Either side blame the opposite for this. And there actually is kind of a tit-for-tat dynamic that’s at play.
However your query actually speaks to a broader subject of why Richard and Bonnie and I got here collectively to write down this e-book within the first place. We initially joined forces in spring 2021 to write down a op-ed as a result of we had been alarmed by the rising refrain of voices in Washington that had been making predictions about when China would use power to claim management over Taiwan. And we had been involved that hyping this menace projected a little bit of American nervousness and insecurity, which risked enjoying into Beijing’s efforts to put on down the psychological confidence of the individuals of Taiwan in their very own future and their democratic lifestyle.
And so we wrote this op-ed, we pitched it to each main information outlet in america and had been rejected by all of them. Fortunately, Nationwide Public Radio gave us the chance to publish there, which we did. However we received collectively for lunch afterwards to lick our wounds a bit from this expertise. And we agreed that slightly than commiserate amongst ourselves, we would have liked to do one thing about this troubling pattern line. And in order that was kind of the genesis of this e-book challenge.
And, to be trustworthy, a part of the work of the e-book is to shine an uncomfortable highlight on a number of the erosion and self-discipline that has taken place in U.S. coverage towards Taiwan in recent times. There’s been an erosion each in self-discipline and, I might say, in precision about how we strategy the Taiwan subject.
So, to reply your query, David, sure, I do suppose that U.S. coverage has shifted considerably prior to now six years. And in equity, I believe that quite a lot of that has been in response to China’s growing strain on Taiwan. However a part of the perform of that is that america, I fear, is departing a bit from first rules in its strategy to Taiwan, and Richard touched upon this a second in the past. I’ll simply add a number of others to that, which is that Taiwan will not be an issue with an American answer. Neither aspect of the Taiwan Strait seeks our mediation or our imposition of an answer on them.
So, the actual purpose of U.S. coverage is to protect peace and stability within the Taiwan Strait. It isn’t the job of america to predetermine what resolutions are acceptable or unacceptable. The individuals of Taiwan have company in defining and pursuing their pursuits. And in the end, Taiwan will not be a card to be performed in a contest with China. Being for Taiwan will not be a approach to present toughness on China. And actually, our perception is that pals don’t deal with pals as strategic pawns.
So, if our e-book solely accomplishes one factor, which is to lift consciousness of a few of these first rules for our strategy to Taiwan, I’ll have thought of it successful.
DOLLAR: So, each of you’ve got emphasised the significance of the desire of the individuals who stay on Taiwan. So, I need to come again to Richard and ask, can we see an opinion polls what individuals in Taiwan need by way of a decision? Do they need reunification? Do they need formal independence? What do they consider a few of these current occasions like Nancy Pelosi’s go to to Taiwan or Speaker McCarthy assembly with Taiwan President Tsai Ing-wen in California not too long ago?
BUSH: Thanks for that query, as a result of I believe that we should always all the time consider what Taiwan individuals suppose as we take into consideration our coverage in the direction of Taiwan. And truly, there’s a truthful quantity of consensus on quite a lot of points. So, let’s take first how do Taiwan individuals establish themselves? Do they establish themselves as Taiwanese, or Chinese language, or each? And remarkably, lower than 4% say they’re Chinese language, 62% say they’re Taiwanese, and 31% say they’re each. The issue with this ballot is that these phrases are by no means outlined, so that you’re not clear what individuals are responding to.
Nevertheless, this identification with Taiwan doesn’t imply that individuals need to create an impartial nation that’s completely separate from China. In actual fact, 6.4% solely consider that we should always transfer for independence now. One other 22% say we should always wait and see how issues go after which in all probability go to independence. Nevertheless, 60.4% consider that the established order ought to be maintained, they like the established order simply superb. Solely 7.1% are in favor of unification.
DOLLAR: Proper. So, that’s actually very putting.
BUSH: Let me go on and discuss to how Taiwan individuals see their safety state of affairs and what would occur if within the unlikely occasion that they declared independence, what would occur? To start with, a overwhelming majority of Taiwan individuals can be blissful to be an impartial nation if it didn’t imply warfare. Nevertheless, 65% of Taiwan individuals consider that in the event that they did go impartial, China would assault, after which the proportion of those that would favor Taiwan independence drops down.
So, Taiwan individuals are very pragmatic about their safety state of affairs. They don’t need to create circumstances that might destroy the great life that they’ve. Additionally they consider that in the event that they went impartial and China attacked, america would in all probability not come to their support. So, that’s one other sobering issue and a contributor to this pragmatism.
Lastly, China has a proposal referred to as “one country-two techniques.” In case you requested Taiwan individuals would they settle for unification beneath that, it’s no less than 65% and doubtless extra.
DOLLAR: So, Ryan, to come back again to you, there’s an vital presidential election developing on Taiwan in January 2024, as I perceive it. And I believe, what Richard simply mentioned provides a superb basis for occupied with that. The present president, Tsai Ing-wen, is from the Democratic Folks’s Get together and he or she can not run for a 3rd time period. And that occasion’s candidate is William Lai, who I see as a little bit of a firebrand by way of pushing for independence. So, may you give us just a little background on this election and what are a number of the doable outcomes and what are the implications?
HASS: Certain. William Lai is the present vp. And, I kind of begin from the premise that William Lai is a great and profitable politician who desires to turn into president. And so, I anticipate that he’s going to arrange his marketing campaign in a means that maximizes his possibilities of being elected. And in sensible phrases, I believe this implies he’s going to want to display that he’s a gradual chief, like Tsai Ing-wen, who’s able to looking for and defending Taiwan’s long run pursuits.
And on the finish of the day, as Richard simply actually helpfully illuminated, the Taiwan voters are deeply pragmatic. They privilege defending the established order. And whereas there are some who want to throw warning to the wind and make a bolt for independence, and there are others who’re open to unification, a big majority of the Taiwan voters are within the center, and people are the voters that William Lai wants to focus on and appeal to if he desires to win the election.
So, I believe that William Lai’s job over the approaching months is to display that he’s able to defending the established order. And even after the election, if he wins, the selection of whether or not to pursue de jure independence is not going to be in his arms alone. I believe that any change to the standing of Taiwan doubtless would require a constitutional modification. And Taiwan’s threshold for amending its structure is without doubt one of the highest of any entity on the earth. And so, even when, you understand, in his coronary heart of hearts, William Lai has goals alongside these strains, it’s nonetheless going to be prohibitively onerous for him to understand them.
Now, after all, Beijing has its personal views on this query, they usually have made clear the depth of their suspicion about William Lai’s intentions. And so they suppose that he’s very dedicated to making an attempt to push Taiwan additional away from China. And so, if William Lai wins, I anticipate Beijing will doubtless search for methods to dial up strain on Taiwan, each to indicate a home viewers that they’re taking the initiative on Taiwan, but additionally to attempt to deter a Lai administration from taking steps that they consider would additional weaken the bonds throughout the Taiwan Strait.
So, that’s in a way, David, how I’ve been and occupied with the DPP aspect of this election.
BUSH: I believe consistent with what Ryan has mentioned, the very last thing that america authorities or any authorities for that matter ought to be doing is prejudging William Lai’s insurance policies 9 months earlier than he could turn into president or a yr earlier than he could turn into president. Sadly, China appears to have already prejudged him, and that would forestall the potential of coexistence between the 2 sides of the Taiwan Strait and a extra peaceable state of affairs than the one we see now.
DOLLAR: So, Richard, the opposite major occasion in Taiwan is the previous Nationalist Get together, Guomindang from Chiang Kai-shek days. And one of many former leaders of that occasion, who was former president of Taiwan, Ma Ying-jeou, was not too long ago on mainland China, met some senior leaders. The message I learn within the press is he got here again with the view that his occasion means peace and the DPP means warfare. And clearly there’s some politics in that sort of formulation. However how do you see the Taiwan individuals reacting to his go to and his message?
BUSH: I believe that former President Ma’s assertion is an efficient marketing campaign slogan, nevertheless it oversimplifies the state of affairs. What China does relies upon very a lot on DPP insurance policies. President Tsai has not challenged Beijing’s backside line. As I mentioned, we should always not prejudge a President Lai would do.
There’s a superb motive why China has not been in a position to persuade Taiwan of its proposal on unification, and that’s as a result of it’s a foul proposal. Beijing ought to look within the mirror to see the rationale for the state of affairs.
Now, you ask, how do Taiwan individuals reply to this rhetoric from former President Ma? I believe that it merely reinforces present divisions. KMT individuals will in all probability agree with what he says. DPP individuals will in all probability disagree. Independents will decide this prediction primarily based on the circumstances and primarily based on what they hear from the assorted candidates within the upcoming election.
The opposite issue right here is america. We have to pursue a coverage that Taiwan leaders are snug with. I believe all of us discovered a lesson from the Pelosi journey and that the polls confirmed {that a} majority of Taiwan individuals felt much less safe after Pelosi’s go to and the next workout routines by the PRC army than they did earlier than. And I believe that each the present Taiwan management and the Biden administration have taken that to coronary heart.
DOLLAR: Yeah, I believe that’s an important level, that if Taiwan turns into a sort of political soccer in america that’s simply not within the pursuits of the individuals of Taiwan.
Ryan, I’m going to come back again to you and let’s discuss just a little bit about economics, that is the commerce podcast, in spite of everything, however I interpret that that very broadly. However Taiwan is a serious buying and selling associate for america. As a small entity, it’s truly a fairly large financial participant. It’s received deep integration with the U.S., nevertheless it has even deeper integration with the mainland. So, can we speak about that just a little bit? Is that this sustainable for Taiwan to have this deep financial relationship with the mainland as these geostrategic tensions are heating up?
HASS: Properly, David, I really feel like I’m stepping a bit into your turf speaking about these points, so I’ll provide perspective however welcome yours as nicely. However earlier than I do, I do need to simply reinforce the purpose that Richard made about the truth that governments actually shouldn’t prejudge what the result of the upcoming election shall be and the way the candidates for it could govern sooner or later.
And I take consolation as a result of I believe that our pals in america governments have largely heeded Richard’s recommendation. I believe that they don’t seem to be prejudging a Lai candidacy or KMT candidacy. I believe their being open, goal, and making an attempt to be balanced and nonpartisan. And I anticipate that that that’s the place america will proceed to be all through this election.
Now, in your query, David, you’re completely proper. I believe that Taiwan is the twenty first largest economic system on the earth and the eighth largest buying and selling associate of america. And the query that you simply’re asking, I believe, actually cuts to the center of the problem of whether or not the established order within the Taiwan Strait is sustainable. As a result of your premise is right that Taiwan trades extra with China than it does with america. I believe China accounts for round 23% of Taiwan’s general commerce, whereas america is round 13%.
And the Tsai administration has made efforts to attempt to diversify Taiwan’s commerce and funding flows in order that they’re not too closely dependent upon and uncovered to the China marketplace for their future development. And I believe that they’ve made some progress on this regard, each via their new southbound coverage to attempt to catalyze deeper commerce and funding hyperlinks with Southeast and South Asia, but additionally via authorities subsidies for reshoring some superior manufacturing from China to Taiwan.
On the finish of the day, although, my sense is that there are limits to this. Taiwan doesn’t have the choice of decoupling totally from China. And I don’t suppose that there can be assist in Taiwan for doing so. I believe that many individuals in Taiwan’s enterprise group acknowledge that China is the second largest economic system on the earth, and that even because it’s rising at a slower charge, it’s rising from an even bigger base. And, there shall be some limits to future financial interplay between Taiwan and China, notably in excessive tech sectors, the place there are nationwide safety dangers that implicate American in addition to Taiwan’s safety.
So, I anticipate that cross-strait financial ties will proceed to be fairly deep going ahead, however there could also be a bit extra guardedness and kind of circumscribing the place commerce will not be doable sooner or later relative to the place we’ve been in previous a long time.
DOLLAR: Yeah, Ryan, I believe that a part of your joint e-book is basically fairly wise. Collectively we’re going to be chopping off a number of the expertise commerce between the U.S. and our companions like Taiwan, vis-à-vis the mainland. However quite a lot of commerce goes to proceed at a excessive stage. And I believe that that’s within the pursuits of individuals, each in Taiwan, additionally america, additionally the mainland. So, as an economist, I hope we will keep quite a lot of that primary commerce.
So, pay attention, final query, I’d like to listen to each of you weigh in on, as a result of we do hear fairly a little bit of discuss concerning the potential for warfare over Taiwan right here in Washington. So, I need to simply tackle head on, begin with Richard, then come to Ryan, what are the dangers of warfare? Can we speculate just a little bit about would the U.S. doubtless ship fight troops? And I suppose, most significantly, what can we do to keep away from warfare? As a result of my sense is this is able to be an actual catastrophe.
BUSH: Properly, that is the primary motive we did this e-book, as a result of we needed to calm individuals down just a little bit over the potential of warfare. I truly suppose the chance of warfare is low. I believe Taiwan leaders are very wise. They’ve accommodated to the established order preferences of the inhabitants. And so, they’re not going to do something silly, which is the primary factor that might set off a PRC assault.
Whether or not and the way the U.S. can be concerned in a Taiwan-China warfare relies upon quite a bit on the circumstances. I believe that we might be extra doubtless to supply intelligence, logistics, arms assist. I believe our Navy and our Air Drive can be extra more likely to be concerned than our floor troops.
I do suppose that avoiding warfare ought to be the primary process. To start with, Taiwan must be succesful to withstand the PRC assault for some time frame earlier than america can get into the battle. Now we have to have the capabilities to have the ability to intervene in a Taiwan state of affairs that might be efficient. And eventually, China has a job to play right here. It has been pursuing a coverage of coercion towards Taiwan, which arguably has made the state of affairs worse. It may modify its coverage in a extra benign route, and we’d all sleep simply.
DOLLAR: Ryan, you get the final phrase.
HASS: You gained’t be stunned, David, to know that I agree with every thing that Richard has mentioned. I’ll simply attempt to embellish a number of factors. I begin from the premise that there’s no query that Xi Jinping is decided to deliver Taiwan beneath Chinese language management. We must always simply kind of settle for that as a established reality, and that’s a sample that traces again to Mao.
Even so, my studying is that Xi Jinping nonetheless would like to win with out preventing if he can. And I believe that he’s nonetheless assured that he can accomplish that. China’s technique is to lift the chance to insupportable ranges for anybody to intervene in a cross-strait battle. Because of this they’re investing so considerably of their army capabilities, but additionally their nuclear capabilities. They need to attempt to push america and others out of the image to isolate Taiwan after which to inform the individuals of Taiwan that they’ve a selection between peace and prosperity by welcoming China’s embrace or destruction in the event that they select to withstand it.
And, what I see is President Xi continues to be preaching persistence to his individuals, telling them that they’re gaining power and momentum, that point a momentum round China’s aspect. And I hear Chinese language counterparts nonetheless use the aphorism that when the melon is ripe it is going to fall from the tree.
And so my sense is that the Chinese language are going to proceed on this course for the foreseeable future except a few situations materialize. The primary, if Taiwan is seen to be completely separating from the mainland or declaring independence, or if China sees a goal of alternative to attempt to seize Taiwan by power at low price or threat.
So, it’s the purpose of our coverage, I consider, to attempt to make sure that these situations by no means materialize. And that can require us to take care of a powerful army deterrent. However it additionally goes to require us to seek out methods to attempt to offset a few of China’s efforts to put on down the psychological confidence of the individuals of Taiwan of their future. It might additionally push us sooner or later into the place of getting to register our opposition or non-support to Taiwan actions that we’re involved could set off battle.
As a result of in the end the implications of any Taiwan battle can be generationally catastrophic. So, we now have to do every thing that we will to restrict threat and to guard our personal pursuits. And that’s going to require us, I believe, frankly, to widen the aperture of our focus past a slim focus on army invasion eventualities. As a result of on the finish of the day, the Taiwan problem is a strategic problem with a army part, it’s not a army problem with a army answer.
DOLLAR: Properly, thanks, gents. I’m David Greenback, and I’ve been speaking to my colleagues Richard Bush and Ryan Hass. Along with one other outstanding China-Taiwan scholar, Bonnie Glaser, they’ve produced an vital new e-book referred to as U.S. Taiwan Relations. Will China’s problem result in a disaster? And so they’ve given us some actually good insights into the strategic state of affairs, U.S.-mainland-Taiwan financial relations, and the vital subject of what we have to do with a purpose to forestall warfare, which would definitely be reflective of the pursuits of the individuals of Taiwan. So, thanks, gents, for becoming a member of me.
BUSH: Thanks for having me.
HASS: Thanks, David.
DOLLAR: Thanks all for listening. We launch new episodes of Greenback and Sense each different week. So, should you haven’t already, observe us wherever you get podcasts and keep tuned.
[music]
It’s made doable by assist from supervising producer Kuwilileni Hauwanga; producer Fred Dews; audio engineer Gastón Reboredo; and different Brookings colleagues. Present artwork is by Katie Merris.
You probably have questions concerning the present or episode strategies, you’ll be able to e-mail us at Podcasts at Brookings dot edu. Greenback and Sense is a part of the Brookings Podcast Community. Discover extra podcasts on our web site, Brookings dot edu slash Podcasts.
Till subsequent time, I’m David Greenback and this has been Greenback and Sense.
